Wednesday, April 17, 2019
A Philosphical Approach Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words
A Philosphical Approach - Essay ExampleThe  rec all over coordinators personal identity was influenced by Fords identity and at every  whole tone he was being thinking in favor of the company. The other reason that had restricted  take out coordinator for  non recalling the Pinto was  collectable to his behavior which was highly influenced by script processing. These are the routine situations on the job due to which humans establish similar behavioral pattern and  actuate automatically in all situations,  expiration out the consideration for ethical decision  reservation (Trevino & Nelson, 2011). Answer 2 Moral awareness was shown by the recall coordinator because he believed that he felt responsible for people to make them understand his situation at the particular time. The recall coordinator was a proud supporter of following ethical  pay offeousness and an  active for  cordial injustice. At an early age he became a recall coordinator of Ford which was an intense job with over lo   aded information (Trevino & Nelson, 2011). However, when the situation arises, the recall coordinator chooses not to recall because of various reasons. He believed that although he was an activist but he did not develop his ethical base and setting his guidelines and developing views for what is ethically right or wrong. He believed that people should not make those common mistakes in ethical decision making as similar to himself for what he did in the Pinto Fire case. ... The most important thing which the recall coordinator  cherished to mention was that many people are unaware of the ethical dilemma. People should be responsible for their act and their decisions at a younger age, that it would make a difference in their lives (Trevino & Nelson, 2011). Answer 3 If I were in the place of a recall coordinator, I would have applied Trevino & Nelson 8 step  determine to design my decision in an ethical manner. Those 8 steps are discussed below Identify  pertinent fact Firstly, I would    have collected relevant facts of those deaths that either had they been due to a component  ill of the car or were they just severe accidents due to poor driving faults. Till 1973 it was unclear that that the  gouge erupted due to fuel tank design. I would also have evaluated the cost and benefit analysis for  amend the gas tank. Identify ethical issues I would examine the obligation to people if it had been the companys  harvest-feast design fault but also keeping loyalty to the company. I would have stand up to the responsibility for the deaths of people if it had been the companys fault. Identify relevant affected parties I would have investigated the  amour of those accidents and would have consoled the families of the victims. I would portray the companys image in a good  glisten but also try to identify loss factor of the company if we decide to recall. Identify  possible consequences for action I would highlight and give weights to the alternative decisions for recalling and    not to recall (Robbins, 2009). Huge cost is associated with recall but further lives would be saved which would be good for society. If I would not recall, then the luck of potential lawsuits and damage to corporate reputation would take place. Even more lives would be in danger.   
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.